The Affordable Path to Greener Shipping: Debunking Myths

The Battle of Alternative Fuels The shipping industry stands at a crossroads, searching for the ideal alternative fuel to lower greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and meet growing environmental demands. This week, SEA-LNG, an esteemed LNG bunker industry body, unveiled a compelling study that revealed LNG and its eco-friendly alternatives as a far more cost-effective option […]

The Battle of Alternative Fuels

The shipping industry stands at a crossroads, searching for the ideal alternative fuel to lower greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and meet growing environmental demands. This week, SEA-LNG, an esteemed LNG bunker industry body, unveiled a compelling study that revealed LNG and its eco-friendly alternatives as a far more cost-effective option for the shipping sector compared to methanol or ammonia.

According to their research, a typical newbuild 14,000 TEU container vessel running on methanol would require a 14% green fuel blend to comply with FuelEU Maritime regulations in 2025. This equates to an annual fuel cost of roughly $55 million, given the usage of biomethanol. The scenario for an ammonia-powered vessel, albeit hypothetical, would demand a 33% green fuel blend for compliance, resulting in an approximate annual fuel cost of $80 million when utilizing e-ammonia.

LNG: The Thrifty Green Solution

In sharp contrast, LNG trumps the competition, demanding no blending and incurring a modest fuel bill of just over $20 million per year. The foundation of these cost calculations is based on the long-term average prices of fossil LNG, grey methanol, and grey ammonia. These figures are then multiplied to estimate the costs of biomass-derived or synthetic replacements.

Detractors may argue that the long-term averages favor LNG by downplaying the high prices witnessed in recent times. They may also assert that methanol and ammonia, being novel fuels, are likely to experience a decrease in costs as production scales up. However, SEA-LNG’s study presents a solid argument in LNG’s favor.

Green Fuels: A Challenging Choice

The repercussions are straightforward: adopting green shipping fuels is set to be an expensive venture. Ship owners, operators, and charterers will likely opt for these eco-friendly options only when mandated by regulators such as the IMO and EU, or when customers aspire to meet voluntary decarbonization targets.

The decisions made by customers, and ultimately consumers, will be arduous. Striking the delicate balance between competitive costs, ESG demands, and regulatory requirements will undeniably shape the future of greener shipping.

Embracing LNG: The Sustainable Compromise

In an era of escalating environmental commitments, choosing an alternative fuel source that minimizes both cost and carbon emissions is crucial. SEA-LNG’s research underscores the affordability and efficiency of LNG, heralding it as the superior choice for worldwide shipping stakeholders.

By embracing LNG and its green alternatives, the maritime industry can make considerable strides in reducing its carbon footprint while navigating the delicate waters of financial sustainability. The path forward may be challenging, but SEA-LNG’s progressive views enlighten and guide the way to a greener shipping future.

Scroll to Top